Personal
Damn it feels good to be a father
4Maija’s contractions started in earnest this morning, and within 45 minutes we were on our way to the hospital (leaving uncooked cookie dough on the kitchen counter… shock!)
Upon arrival, the midwives seemed to relax just a little when they found out it was our first child. “This’ll take some time” I’m sure they were thinking. Until they checked Maija out, and found she was already 8cm dilated. This baby’s coming out!
2 hours later… for a total of 4 hours labour… James Eden Puddle!
Born naturally and healthy, with a full head of red hair! Just like his uncle. 2.9kg… 6.3lbs. Mum and baby are doing great.
Johnny on the spot
0I don’t remember when I first started using the phrase “Johnny on the spot”, but it’s one of my favourite sayings. I use it sparingly, and try to use it appropriately.
The grammatical genesis of ‘Johnny on the spot’ cannot be traced very clearly, but the phrase certainly originated from the longer and less expressive one, ‘Johnny is always on the spot when wanted.’ … The expression is to some extent a variation or rather a continuation of that other phrase, ‘He gets there.’” Johnny here must be a general name for any young male and doesn’t refer to a real person.
The church and homosexuality
0I just finished reading 2 excellent essays by gay Christians, examining the two opposing viewpoints within the church, and especially the gay Christian community. I love reading honest, well researched and well thought out arguments. The two viewpoints referred to are thus:
I believe that homosexuality is an “issue” that remains un-dealt-with, in much of Christianity today. I know of too many homosexual people who love Jesus, who have had grievous sins committed against them by others who profess love for Christ, because of their homosexuality. It saddens me. As is pointed out in one of the essays, regardless of your viewpoint, homosexuality may be THE issue – like slavery in the past – that Western Christianity as a whole currently faces, or isn’t facing because of ignorance to the necessity of facing it.
How’s that for a run on sentence? I, like CS Lewis, use run on sentences to full effect. But enough of me. I highly recommend that you read these two essays. They are long, by casual internet reading standards, but they are well written and I believe do closely and fairly examine both sides of the argument.
May God lead you to love and peace.
Mix – Goodbye 2008
0Maija and I have had a lovely Christmas with family in Finland, and then spent a few days with friends. Tonight we’re off to party at a cottage with another bunch of friends, and so I shall wish you a Happy New Years!
As is my custom, I offer a new years eve mix, commemorating 2008. Please enjoy responsibly.
2008 has been an excellent year for trance and house music. Just superb. And I think my New Years mix reflects that. We start off showcasing some juicy prog house, and gradually move into some of the best trance music I’ve come across in years. Biggups to all these artists, who are producing great music! And biggups to you for completing another year. Have a great new years celebration and an even better 2009.
J Puddy – Goodbye 2008 – high quality
J Puddy – Goodbye 2008 – low quality
Tracklist:
mango – every sunrise (joel armstrong remix)
dinka – slightly different
shiloh – push
chunk and twist – battery life
john dahlback – blink (d.o.n.s dbn chainsaw remix)
w&w – mustang
kate bush – running up that hill (infusion vs joel armstrong remix)
andy moor – fake awake
armin van buuren feat sharon den adel – in and out of love (the blizzard remix)
ilya soloviev – sunwaves (static blue remix)
ilya soloviev & paul miller – lover summer (orjan nilsen remix)
4mal – time is burning (topher jones)
sunlounger feat zara – lostHappy New Year! Enjoy!
Nobody wins
0Following on from my last post, a good friend sent me this article in Macleans. Here’s a snippet:
THERE IS nothing wrong with minority governments, per se. It depends what kind of minority. Do we want the kinds of minority Parliaments we have had in recent years, a clutch of hobbled regional or quasi-regional parties, fingers perpetually on the button, endlessly threatening to pitch us all into another pointless election in the vain hope that, if the swing voters can be distracted in their direction, if the splits go their way, if they can demean and belittle their opponents enough, if they can depress turnout even further than before, they might just fluke their way into a majority? Or will we accept that, whatever the ancient glories of the two-party system, it no longer exists?
If we must have five-party politics, let them at least be parties with real differences, and national appeal. Away with the system that guarantees the Bloc two-thirds of the seats in Quebec on the strength of little more than one-third of the vote. Away with the ghettos of Conservative Alberta, or Liberal Toronto, where it is scarcely worth campaigning, so predictable are the results. Away with “strategic voting,” and other attempts to tell people they may not vote for the party they support, but must vote against the party they fear. Away with the disgraceful situation of a party winning almost a million votes, as the Greens did this time out, and getting zero seats.
Indeed, when you think about it, many of the problems identified in this piece have their origins in the perverse incentives of our highly leveraged, winner-take-all electoral system. Why have the Tories degenerated into mush? Because they face no competition on the right, Reform-style uprisings being more or less outlawed for fear of “splitting the vote.” Why did the Liberals ignore their growing weakness all these years? Because they could still count on the bizarre distortions of first-past-the-post to reap a bushel of seats from one region or another. Why has the Bloc become an immovable blot on the national scene, long after its original purpose was exhausted? Ditto. Why have majority governments become next to impossible? Why has politics degenerated into such vicious, empty partisanship? Why do so many people no longer bother to vote? Because the system is broken, and if this election won’t persuade us to change it, nothing will.
What to do with the Canadian government
3If you’ve been following Canadian politics at all, you’ll know the last month has seen some very interesting headlines. I’m convinced now more than ever, that what Canada needs most is electoral reform. The current system of election is so remarkably unrepresentative of the population’s desires, that it’s no wonder we end up with back to back no-confidence votes and posturing to take over the government. No matter who you support, I believe you owe it to yourself to examine the way our government is elected, and to look at the alternatives.
Fair Vote Canada is a nonprofit, multi-partisan advocacy group for electoral reform in Canada. They published a paper back in 2005, on making Every Vote count, which you can read here. If that links goes down, I’m hosting a copy here as well. I encourage everyone to read it in it’s entirety, to gain an understanding of the voting alternatives, allowing you to decide for yourself if you think we’re currently being represented fairly.
(We’re not, by the way.)
With, not for
1I look forward to the day when people, en masse, realise that they don’t need to (and can’t) do anything to earn God’s favour, and start to simply live with Christ (rather than for Christ).
This is from Wayne Jacobson’s book – He Loves Me – via my good friend Dallas. The emphasis is mine.
As you grow increasingly certain that his love for you is not connected to your performance, you will find yourself released from the horrible burden of doing something for him. You’ll realize that your greatest ideas and most passionate deeds will fall far short of what he really wants to do through you.
I used to be driven to do something great for God. I volunteered for numerous opportunities and worked hard in the hopes that some book I was writing, some church I was planting, or some organization I was helping would accomplish great things for God. While I think God used my misguided zeal in spite of myself, nothing I did ever rose to the level of my expectations. Instead, my pursuits seemed to distract me from God, consume my life, and leave me stressed out.
I’m not driven anymore. I haven’t tried to do anything great for God in more than a decade, and yet I have seen him use my life in ways that always exceed my expectations. What changed? I did, by his grace.
My desire to do something great for God served me far more than it ever did him. It kept me too busy to enjoy him and distracted me from the real ministry opportunities he brought across my path each day.
I used to start my day laying out my plans before God and seeking his blessing on them. How silly! Why would I want God to be the servant of my agenda? God’s plans for my day far exceed mine. I can almost hear him now as I awaken: “Wayne, I’m going to touch some people today. Do you want to come along?”
It’s amazing how gentle that is, but all the more powerful because it is. I don’t have to go. God’s work won’t be thwarted by my lack of participation. He will touch people anyway, but I wouldn’t miss it for the world. He does things I’ve never dreamed of and uses me in ways I could never conceive. His focus on touching people instead of managing programs has revolutionized my view of ministry. It requires no less diligence on my part but directs that diligence in far more fruitful endeavors.
If you’ve never know the joy of simply living in God’s acceptance instead of trying to earn it, your most exciting days in Christ are ahead of you. People who learn to live out of a genuine love relationship with the God of the universe will live in more power, more joy, and more righteousness than anyone motivated by fear of his judgement.
The Ten Commandments
0It’s become my conviction that fundamentally we are not supposed to follow the Ten Commandments. I mentioned this in my post about The Shack… the perspective that I fundamentally follow Christ, and he may lead me where he wills. I want to dig into that a bit here, because I think choosing to follow the Ten Commandments is at odds with choosing to follow Christ.
My three main thoughts on this are:
- It can move the focus off Christ and his grace, and back into performance based law keeping.
- They’re too easy. The Ten Commandments are too easily kept… and allow us to fall into the trap of pride and “arrival”.
- God didn’t need The Ten Commandments, or want us to live under them at all.
We are new creations in Christ, and the Law holds no water for us. Christ completed the Law, fulfilled it absolutely, so while we are with Christ the Law is completed for us. It is finished. Peter in Acts goes as far as saying “Don’t tempt the Lord” regarding Christian Gentile commitment to the Law.
Too easy… I was battling with this yesterday, as a good friend who I respect and often disagree with wrote an article on the Ten Commandments. It occurred to me that I’ve taught children to follow the Ten Commandments, and I know I was raised to follow them as well. And yet, we have the rich young ruler of Matthew come to Christ saying “I’ve done all this. What next?” Christ tells him to sell all he has, and give the money to the poor, something we understand the young man can’t bring himself to do. This is crucial to me… the fact that he has followed these laws to the letter, but his heart hasn’t changed. He’s dotted every i and crossed every t, all the while missing the point completely. We can keep the Ten Commandments and think we are justified, think we have arrived at some level of obedience or right-living, and yet have missed it completely. I don’t believe it’s in God’s character for us to miss him. He is continually drawing us to himself.
When I look at the Old Testament, I’m struck by the progression of things. Adam and Eve walked and talked with God. If God created things like this, I have to believe this was his primary intention for life and humanity. That this was how it was meant to be, always and forever. At this point man had 1 command, from God, not to eat fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. To me this is God saying “Will you trust me? Will you trust that I know best? Will you depend on me, to lead you where it’s worthy to be lead?” But the enemy whispers to us, saying that we can make those decisions for ourselves; that we are a better judge of our own future, and independence isn’t such a bad thing. And so starts the slow but sure spiral into madness.
Fast forward a couple of thousand years, and we have a group of people God has called his own. He’s led them out of Egypt and been providing for their every need. And yet, the people Israel have no desire to personally interact with God. They’re more than happy for Moses to represent them, and to give them a list of do’s and don’ts so that they feel they’re on the right track. They don’t want the interaction, they fundamentally don’t want the relationship. Look at Romans 9:30-33. So God says “Have it your way. Your hearts are turned away from me, so if you want to be justified here is a Law you must keep.” But the New Testament tells us God never intended for The Law! Just like Israel later demanded they have a king, like the nations around them, God says “Fine… but if you want one you’re going to live with the consequences.” Are we not a remarkably disobedient species? We want our own way, continually, and then we want that way to be easy. We complain when we can’t keep the Law, or when our man-made king tramples us under foot.
Here, for me, is the point. Christ comes, lives a sinless life, allows his blood to be shed as a sacrifice, and completes the Law once and for all. He offers each of us his blood, to cover us as well, if we will just enter relationship with him. If we will just return to the garden with God, where he’s still saying “Will you trust me? Will you trust that I know best? Will you depend on me, to lead you where it’s worthy to be lead?”
This trumps everything else. Will we move away from our independance and into dependance? Will we give up our self help, our self improvement? The rules we choose to live by don’t help us in that relationship, they’re fundamentally at odds, because we’re trying to improve ourselves, trying to independantly become a better person. Christ isn’t calling us to become better people, he’s calling us to love him. And he’s calling us to walk with him. Will we trust that he knows best? Will we trust that he will provide everything that we need to continue in relationship with him, to go deeper?
Meat pasties
3I’m a sucker for pastry and meat. It’s simply one of the best combinations evar. Last night we took a stab at Cornish pasties. We loosely followed this recipe:
New Zealand Pasties recipe.
In future, I’d use less potato (I used too much this time, admittedly), more mushrooms and spices, and roll the pastry thinner. All in all though, very easy, and very delicious.

English Hothouse Cucumbers, and other innapropriate forms of measurement
1Maija subscribed us to a number of pregnancy emails regarding the development of our baby. We get a couple of emails each week, updating us with how big the baby may be, and providing advice and various pieces of information. It’s all quite good and informative, except for the sometimes strange choice of fruits or vegetables used to describe the size of the fetus (or foetus, if you prefer). They range from recognizable, common fruit (which gives us a good idea the size of the baby), to ambiguous and mysterious food items, which surely isn’t helpful in letting us know much of anything.
I present to you a list of the ways our baby’s size has been described, over the last 16 weeks. Italicized, are those I find amusing.
- a head of cauliflower
- an English hothouse cucumber
- an average rutabaga
- an ear of corn
- a large mango
- a spaghetti squash
- a carrot
- a large heirloom tomato
- a bell pepper
- a turnip
- an avocado
- an apple
- a lemon
- a medium shrimp
- a lime
- a fig
- a grape
I’m sure kumquat was listed one week, but I can’t find it now.



Recent Comments