Posts by Jonathan Puddle
Apple: The future is ours
2It’s no secret that I’m not a fan of Apple (for the record, I’m not a fan of apples, either). I’ve used their products, I own their products, and I’ll be the first to agree that they make FANTASTIC products… but I still don’t like Apple. For those fanboys out there…I also don’t like Microsoft… though I like their products more than Apple’s. Here’s the thing though… I truly believe, all hating aside, that more people need to start seriously considering whether their computing future is one they are happy for Apple to control, or not. Because make no mistake… control is exactly what Apple stands for.
To get your application running on the iPhone or iPad computing platforms, you must go through Apple’s App Store… which is the most genius invention Apple have come up with, to date. How does Apple ensure quality of their products? They control the variables. Until recently those variables have been predominantly hardware elements, but not any longer. Apple now has the ability to control what software you run on your devices, and you have to through Apple to get it, so they know what you’re using. If Apple decides they don’t want a third party product that competes with one of their own titles to even be available on their platform… it’s gone. Which means you only have the illusion of choice, when choosing what software to run on your device.
Some years ago, Microsoft got itself into trouble for bundling Internet Explorer with it’s operating system, thereby making it the de-facto method of browsing the web. Apple, naturally, does exactly the same thing, 0nly they usually don’t get the flack for it that Microsoft does. This has always puzzled me… but I suppose with Apple owning such a relatively small market share of desktop computers, regulators haven’t really noticed that Apple will have 90 million mobile devices in use by years end, and up to 200 million iTunes dependent devices by end of 2011. That’s enough market share to do whatever the hell they want… because so many people are so completely sunk into the Apple ecosystem. They could launch a broadcasting network, for example. Naturally as the owners of the network, they wouldn’t broadcast anything they didn’t like. Though of course, once you’ve subscribed to your plans and programs… the rules might change a little.
Apple, once the revolutionary, once the kid sticking it to the man… is very swiftly becoming Big Brother. Their market value is now more than that of Microsoft. Do you really want anyone, be it Apple, Google, or your government, controlling your speech, your artistic freedom, or what you do with the tools you purchase? This is not me being a conspiracy theorist… I hate conspiracy theories… but when Apple says that Flash is dead for their platform… then anyone working in a creative industry should be concerned.
Most people don’t care, because the computers, phones, media players and so on that they rely on today are just so gorgeous, and work so well. But I care. I don’t own an iPhone, not because I don’t want one, but because I don’t need to be online at all hours of the day and night. My wife and my kid don’t need me to be on my work email at 3am, and they don’t need me to be updating Twitter when I’m on the toilet. I don’t own an iPad because I don’t need one… and buying something you don’t need seems irresponsible to me.
But for the rest of the consumer public… who are oh so happy with the latest anything… Apple will own the future. If that’s fine with you… great, but I’d rather not be the one paying the piper.
IIS quirks in Windows Server 2008 R2
0We’ve been testing our first install of Server 2008 R2 this month, it will be replacing an aging webserver running Server 2003. IIS 7.5 brings with it a few new things, the most notable is a new interface. Less noticeable at first, is the lack of an SMTP server. Sometimes you need a quick and dirty SMTP server for delivering email from websites, and the Windows SMTP server is great for this. Coupled with the use of a smarthost for relaying, it can cover a lot of basic needs very well. Server 2008 R2 DOES actually include an SMTP server, but to access it you must install the SMTP components in the Server Manager, and then open up the IIS 6 manager (old school style), which allows you to manage the SMTP server.
Now, strangely, the first few times I tried to access the IIS 6 manager, it wouldn’t open. I received an error stating the wait operation had timed out. I checked everything I could, there was nothing useful in the event log… so eventually I removed IIS completely and then slowely re-added it piece by piece. Now everything works fine… though this morning I found the entire SMTP configuration had reset to default, so there may be something still a little wonky here.
I ran across another odd quirk, which seems to be default behaviour in IIS since 5.1, but I’m surprised that I’ve never encountered it before. The problem arose when we found Windows Authentication just wasn’t working when we set a hostname. Without a hostname it would work, but with a hostname we just kept getting prompted for authentication over and over again. The event log revealed a login failure with the status code 0xC000006D. A quick Google search turned up this document which explains it: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896861
So we disabled the DNS check, and now the sites all work fine. Strange things… but this is why you test.
Who owns these basic words?
1I was bored today and had some time on my hands… I spent that time finding out what sites were at interesting places like “yes.com” or “no.com” for example. You may enjoy the fruits of my research… but likely you won’t. My favourite pick is “down.com” for showing just a touch of character.
blue.com – news aggregator
red.com – Digital cinema company and community
yellow.com – yellowpages
black.com – Africa focussed news aggregator
white.com – domain squatter
off.com – Off! bug repellent
on.com – chat site like chatroullete
hot.com – Obama site?
cold.com – domain squatter
good.com – Technology firm
bad.com – domain squatter
yes.com – internet user radio and chat, like chatroullete meets last.fm
no.com – norwegian search engine using Google
up.com – Union Pacific railroad company
down.com – dictionary definitions for the word “down”
left.com – Left Field Productions video game company
right.com – Manpower and management services company
wrong.com – domain squatter
in.com – Yahoo style news and views
out.com – Out Magazine for gay culture
smart.com – Smart brand cars
dumb.com – popular games, jokes, sites and news
empty.com – coming soon…
full.com – domain squatter
cute.com – domain squatter
ugly.com – Comedy Central site for Ugly Americans
pretty.com – domain squatter
beautiful.com – Redirects to pg.com (Proctor and Gamble)
thin.com – domain squatter
thick.com – domain squatter
safe.com – Software company who make CAD/spatial design software
dangerous.com – Coming soon, site for extreme lifestyles including extreme sports, MMA, tattoos and piercings, clothing, etc.
safety.com – “the official safety site of the internet”, general safety tips
danger.com – Subsidiary of Microsoft, makes mobile communications devices
funny.com – “your destination for anything funny”, videos, pictures, jokes site
sad.com – domain squatter
Using terminal services with MS NBL in VMWare virtual machines
2While in Toronto recently, we rebuilt our terminal server cluster taking advantage of a new VMWare host server. We had 2 physical servers for our TS cluster before, linked up with Microsoft’s NLB (Network Load Balancing). We provisioned 3 new VMs (we’ve got lots of headroom, so we can pass that to our users), and went about setting up the NLB service to cluster them. We quickly ran into some odd behaviour, so I’m going to list a couple of things to be aware of.
- NLB can run in unicast or multicast mode. Each method has drawbacks and benefits, but if you’re running VMs then you’ll essentially HAVE to use multicast. This is due to the way unicast load balancing works, by establishing virtual MAC addresses for the adapters. When all of these adapters are virtual, your switches can get freaked out and won’t resolve traffic properly. Using multicast lets you get around this problem.
- Changing between unicast and multicast can cause all manner of problems. If you’ve had your cluster set up for unicast, and you want to change it to multicast, make sure to remove the host IP (the one IP that all members of the cluster have in common) from the IP address mappings, BEFORE you change to multicast mode. Otherwise you’ll get IP conflicts and your network adapters will disable themselves.
- When using multicast, you may run into problems getting your terminal services cluster onto the internet. Not all firewalls can handle the routing of multicast packets; we use pfsense, and it does not handle multicast traffic. Clients who try to connect from outside the LAN to the terminal server cluster behind the firewall don’t get anywhere, the connection just times out. This is because the firewall is dropping the multicast packets that are used to communicate with the TS cluster. To get around this, we just configured the firewall to send non-LAN clients to one specific member of the cluster; it’s not ideal, but it does the trick until pfsense bakes in the support for multicast traffic.
Settling into 2010
1We’ve just got back from a 2 month trip to Toronto, where we had a lovely time with family and friends. But we are glad to be home, 2 months is a long time to be away… staying in other people’s homes, etc. Now we’re starting to feel like we can actually begin this year, which is a good feeling. We’ve got a few plans and goals for the year, which are exciting us now.
Such as:
- buying a car (looking for something used and cheap)
- saving for a trip to NZ for Christmas
- Maija finishing her thesis before the next baby comes
- welcoming another baby to the family
- starting to look for a new place to live (we will outgrow our current home in 12 months)
Fun times ahead!
New mix: Goodbye 2009
1I was a bit behind schedule this year in getting my New Years’ mix down. My apologies to all… being a Dad is busy work sometimes. But the mix is ready for your listening pleasure! I chose to feature this mix on the Tastyfresh Homegrown podcast (which I am the host of), so it’s available exclusively from there. There was sooooo much good music this year, it just doesn’t stop!
Here’s the download link: http://www.tastyfresh.com/rokdownloads/podcasts/homegrown_ep10.mp3
Tracklist:
Calvin Harris – Flashback (Eric Prydz remix)
BT – Rose of Jericho (Sultan and Ned Shepard remix)
DBN ft. Madita – Asteroidz (Sultan and Ned Shepard remix)
Calvin Harris – I’m Not Alone (Deadmau5 remix)
Morgan Page – Fight For You (Beltek remix)
Jerome Isma-Ae – Hold that Sucker Down
Ferry Corsten feat Novastar – Because (Original Extended remix)
Chris Lake, Marco Lys – Violins
Neelix – Round One
Boom Jinx & Andrew Bayer – To The Six (Matt Lange Remix)
Super8 & Tab – Irufushi
Gareth Emery – Metropolis
Menno de Jong & Leon Bollier – Last Light Tonight (Extended mix)
Be: Gold – Starstruck (Jochen Miller remix)
Sunny Lax – Miss Grey (Adam Nickey remix)
Adam Szabo – Falcon
Josh Gabriel presents Winter Kills – Deep Down (alex morph remix)
Breakfast – Remember
Offline book lending ruining the publishing industry
0The RIAA and others use ridiculous headlines such as mine, to try and explain their economic troubles. Piracy is always to blame. Strange that 2009 saw the biggest holiday records broken once again, despite the “rampant” piracy.
Here’s a great and humurous perspective on the matter.
Apparently, over 2 billion books were “loaned” last year by a cabal of organizations found in nearly every American city and town. Using the same advanced projective mathematics used in the study cited by Publishers Weekly, Go To Hellman has computed that publishers could be losing sales opportunities totaling over $100 Billion per year, losses which extend back to at least the year 2000. These lost sales dwarf the online piracy reported yesterday, and indeed, even the global book publishing business itself…
…From what we’ve been able to piece together, the book “lending” takes place in “libraries”.
Perspective and Priorities
0Andrew Gazaneo quoted a comment from Marc Driscoll, about perspective, which I liked:
“You can pray for a woman I just met. Got off alcohol only to get on prescription drugs, just lost her 2 little kids to the state, & her husband got arrested for beating her. Meanwhile, some people are really frustrated that their 3G connection is slow. Perspective is a great gift.”
I just finished a poll for Avaaz, a worldwide human action network. And the results from 40,000+ members trouble me slightly:
I don’t care about the specifics of global warming (or cooling), or climate change perse… but I am committed to being less wasteful and destructive on this planet. But not if it means I must turn a blind eye on HUMAN issues. I think Avaaz is a good organization, but it troubles me how their members have prioritized the above list.
10 favourite cinematic experiences of the last decade
1Many people and organizations have released their best 100 or best 50 films of the last decade already, which are available elsewhere. I’ve decided to distill my own favourites into 10 of the best cinematic experiences. So that means the Lord of the Rings trilogy are grouped into one, as they truly are intended to be a coherent cinematic experience, but Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are separate. This is not what I think to be the best of the decade, just the ones that I personally enjoyed the most.
- Lord of the Rings (a masterpiece)
- Avatar (Avatar will literally and figuratively usher in the next 10 years of cinema)
- Little Miss Sunshine (if you haven’t seen this, go see it now, it’s the best “family” movie not suited for families, ever.)
- Gladiator
- The Dark Knight (special mention also for The Prestige, and Batman Begins. Christopher Nolan is a genius)
- Big Fish (special mention also for Tim Burton’s Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street)
- The Simpsons Movie (I was looking for nothing more than a regular episode stretched to 90 minutes, and that’s what I got. Fantastic!)
- Inglourious Basterds (special mention also for everything Tarantino did this decade: Kill Bill Vols 1 & 2, and Grindhouse)
- The Bourne Trilogy (I had to think hard about this. Having read the Bourne novels, the films really pale in comparison. But as films go, they are pretty excellent.)
- Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Other special mentions:
- Star Wars Episode II and III – awful. It’s worth mentioning how awful they are. I recently re-watched all the prequels, and they’re just so bad, it’s painful.
- The Matrix Sequels – I re-watched them all recently, and I think they were judged quite harshly. They are enjoyable films, and I dare say, good filmmaking.
- The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou – Wes Anderson was in top form here, as was Bill Murray. I have yet to see Fantastic Mr Fox, though I’m told it’s excellent.
- Wall*E – I’m not a huge fan of Disney/Pixar films. I enjoy them, but they generally don’t rank high with me. Wall*E was the one I enjoyed the most, I did not see Up.
- Everyone tells me I would love Pan’s Labyrinth. I never got around to seeing it.
Highlights of the coming years? I’m definitely looking forward to The Hobbit and it’s accompanying film, the Tin Tin film(s), and the rumoured Alien 5 helmed by Ridley Scott. Here’s to 10 more years of exciting cinema!



Recent Comments