If you value the environment don’t buy from Apple or Lenovo
Greenpeace has issued some fascilnating data on how “green” various technology makers processes are.
Your Guide to Green Electronics
and
How the Companies Stack Up
7 Nokia – Good but room for improvement on amounts recycled.
7 Dell – Points lost for not yet having models without the worst chemicals. Strong support for takeback.
5.3 Sony Ericsson – Some models without some of the worst chemicals, but bad on precautionary principle and take back.
5 Samsung – Points for toxic phase out but not good on take back and recycling.
4.7 Sony – Some models without the worst chemicals, but bad on precautionary principle and take back.
4.7 Hewlett Packard – Timelines only for toxics phase out plan. Good on amounts recycled. Deducted one penalty point (Sept 06).
4.3 LGE – Points for toxic phase out date but bad on take back.
3.3 Panasonic – Only good on chemicals management.
3 Toshiba – Some models without the worst chemicals, but no timelines for elimination and poor on takeback.
3 Fujitsu-Siemens – Points for some models free of worst chemicals, but poor on takeback.
2.7 Apple – Low scores on almost all criteria.
2.3 Acer – Should do better on all criteria.
1.7 Motorola – Points for chemicals management. Recently broke clean up promise.
1.3 Lenovo – The lowest score of all companies.
I actually read about this last night, forwarded around the “I wish my Mac came in green” spoof page, and then got a response back from a friend, linking to a post debunking Greenpeace’s claims about Apple products.
I’m not exactly sure which to believe, as the debunker (I wish I had the link handy; I might have sent it to you?) sounds more shrill than credible in his post, and I always thought Apple had a better enviro track record than most. But then again, this is the company that told it’s users to buy new iPods when their first gen batteries eventually died. :/