Archive for December, 2004
Live
0The new design is now online, as you’ve already noticed, (unless you’re reading this via RSS). If you find any problems with it, let me know. If the problem is that you just don’t like it, then kiss my bum.
The image I am using in the background was a beautiful piece of graphic by Precurser, of EndEffect.com, which I’ve sucked the colour and contrast out of. (I think his site’s currently down, cause he often does a redesign around New Year’s.) We’re still in communication about my using his image, so if it suddenly changes for another one, you’ll know why.
But enjoy the redesign. It’s best viewed at 1024 * 768 resolution, so right-click your Desktop, go Properties, then Settings, and change your Screen Resolution to 1024 * 768.
Merry Christmas Everyone
0Yeah. Merry Christmas suckers!
I hope you all have a safe time doing whatever fun stuff you have planned. I’m off to the airport in a hour or so to pick up my Father, who is moving back to Toronto. 3 months has gone fast. I’m a little nervous to be honest, but excited too.
This week should see a lot of sitting around doing freakin nothing, and loving it. Hopefully some snowboarding, if I can just get me a snowboard. A little DJ-ing most likely. Should be a good week off. Can’t tell yet whether I’ll be blogging or not during the week. You’ll just have to pop in and see.
Oh, and my new design should go up tonight, or in the next couple of days. I’m just awaiting permission to use an image from another guy’s website. Plays the Hits will probably have to stay for now, as I have had no inspiration for a new title.
Merry Christmas.
Congratulations are in order…
0No time like Christmas to get engaged. Good work Lee. w00t!
New Site Design
0I’m working on a new site design, quite different to this one, and I have run into a slight problem. The look is very industrial, a lot of silver/grey and blue, and the name, “J Puddy Plays the Hits,” doesn’t seem to fit with it.
I really like the design, so the name might have to go. Any suggestions?
Back to the fray
0I highly recommend Songs to Burn Your Bridges By, by Project 86. It’s currently my favourite CD. How ironic.
It was indeed wrong of me to sight a book that I have not read. I retract that statement. I will not go back and edit my previous post, but I now regret saying it. As to my motives for public displays of affection with my girlfriend, she knows I love her. And it’s not because I am affectionate with her publicly. If the reason people are affectionate publicly is to show their Significant Others that they love them, then I know a load of loveless relationships.
Someone’s going to say, “Ha, there are loads of loveless relationships! My point exactly.” But whatever, I’ll let it stand. Maija knows I love her because of the way I treat her publicly and privately, the way I touch her, the way I speak to her, and the time and money I spend on her. Ask her. I know she loves me because of the things she makes me, the things she says to me, the time she spends with me, the way she touches me, the things other people tell she has said about me etc. etc. The list goes on.
When I am affectionate with her in public, it is (aside from simply loving her) to show the world that I love her. When I shout at the TACF Riverside Cafe, “I LOVE MAIJA MACLEOD!” that is also to tell that the world that I love her.
As to being upset about the infamous text messages, I honestly don’t know anymore. I never interpreted it as lesbianism between the two of them. Unfortunately, when I used that word in my first post, many people carried it out of the context it was meant for. The word carried more weight than I realized it would. For that, my apologies. Still though, I don’t know. Maybe I’m just sensitive about homosexual issues, and I jumped on it in a nervous panic. Or maybe while not being wrong in and of themselves, the messages were a little over the top. I honestly don’t know.
If I can have some constructive input from anyone, especially someone female, ie. Ninja, input away.
Lambast!
0Incredibly selfish eh. Your mom’s incredibly selfish.
Anyway. So, the deal is folks, I’m not confused. I’m not caught up in a deep inner turmoil. I must have come across that way for so many people to respond in the way they did.
Let me explain further, as it seems necessary, maybe only to save my own ass.
Firstly… I too am an affectionate person. My primary love language is touch. Mel’s comment was more on track than most peoples. Yes I panicked a bit, and yes it’s largely my issue, but yes, there is also such a thing as unbalance. There are times when the affection between any guy and guy, and girl and girl, can be unhealthy simply because they are directing their affection at the wrong person.
I do not think that all girls who are affectionate with each other are lesbians. If you thought I thought that, then I label you an idgit for not properly reading my previous posts. What I do think is that some people (regardless of gender and marital status) have slightly misguided affections. I know that I am right in this, because A) people have told me I am, and B) there is a whole book devoted to the subject. It’s called Every Woman’s Battle. I’m serious. Read it. (I haven’t read it yet myself, but I plan too, once I finish Every Young Man’s Battle.)
To Mr Rude Pants Observer:
When you are frustrated because your girlfriend feels comfortable being touchy with her girlfriends, however she wont with you… you need to check yourself not her. Why are you frustrated sir? Is it because she is getting some positive attention from some of her close friends? Or is it because you are not the only person that is giving her that attention. With my objective point of view it is obvious that you are not confident and secure in the relationship.
You may be right. Or you may just be a girl who’s uncomfortable giving affection to her boyfriend. I am affectionate with my girlfriend because I love her and want everyone to know. I do not think it is unfair of me to ask the same from my girlfriend. By the by, she’s becoming more affection with me in public, because she is becoming more used to it, and more used to me. I think you are the one with the issue, my friend.
Honestly who tells their girlfriend not to hug her other friends?!?!
Umm… not me. You must have been reading the wrong blog. I never wrote that and I don’t even want to write that.
If you want to take on the role of the leader, then I sure hope you are leading in every other aspect of life.
I’m doing my best. I obviously have a lot to learn, but I’m aware of it, and aren’t afraid to deal with it.
Bottom line is, I don’t have a problem with the way my girlfriend treats me or her other friends. My problem is when someone is writing things to her that I would write to her. That person has her own boyfriend to write those things too. I don’t think it’s write that she was texting my girlfriend on a daily basis telling her that she loved her and missed her etc. The first time it happened, my lovely lady thought it was from me.
That’s my point. End of story. I don’t have a problem with female affection. If you read my previous post you would understand that. To everyone else, sorry for the confusion, at least you were kind about letting me think out loud.
And you’re done.
0So – after talking to Maija again, some married people, and others – my thoughts are thus:
The problem I have noticed (misplaced affection), is indeed a problem because:
Girl’s (or anyone for that matter) should not be giving/taking affection to/from anyone, that should be going to God or her Significant Other.
However, the problem is not as rampant or as serious as I had at first thought, because:
A. Girls are made to be more affectionate. It’s the side of God they represent. I did know this before I got onto this track, but I had forgotten it. I have since learned that for some girls they can’t express this affection due to pain from previous hurt in their life. Only once they receive healing are they able to express this love for one another.
B. It was partly my issue. Maija, who I love more than me, has in the past been uncomfortable showing me affection in front of others. So all I would see was her being touchy and feely with other girls, and then being a little more distant with me. But she’s getting much better. Hehe, anyone at her house party last night could have seen her kissing me plenty of times. W00T! (Haha, I’m sooo getting in trouble for this one.)
Remember my argument that all this was to do with an infiltration of subversive lesbianism from the feminist movement? Haha, well Maija pointed out that it’s equally likely that I blame lesbianism because it is so rampant, and acceptable, and if you see anything along those lines, you can just say, “Oh, they’re lesbians.”
So the argument for is the same as the argument against. I think this post is at the same time the most important of all my previous posts in this theme, and the least coherent. I hope it makes sense to you.
On to lighter things: I got a new CD today.
3
0I’m quite impressed with Sarah’s comment. Go and read it, on the post after this one.
She makes the point that, yes, we should be taking everything from God first, but that God also gives us friends to help in the process. I agree, and I suspected someone would point that out. I talked with a few people tonight and have gained perhaps a more balanced insight.
One man with the same initials as I talked a lot about storge love. He said women are made to be more affectionate, because that is the side of God that they represent. John Eldredge talks a lot about that exact same thing in Wild at Heart. That men are built to represent the wildness and the strength of God, while women are made to represent the love and the kindness and caring side of God.
(As a side note, this is one of the reasons that I believe homosexual marriage to be fundamentally flawed. You don’t need to get all Biblical about it, it’s pure and simple, God made a man, and matched him with a woman.)
Anyway, I realise that I need to be careful in what I say on this topic. I don’t want to give the idea that I think girls should not be affectionate. I just think that there is a healthy balance that is being overlooked. I definitely think that guys still have a lot to learn about love and affection.
On the flip side though, if I am learning about love and affection, to love and be affectionate with my future wife, I want my future wife to be wild and strong with me. I don’t mean that in a sexual way, though I don’t mean it in a non sexual way either. I mean in life in general. I want to be wild and strong, I want to lead her places spiritually and physically that she would be afraid to go on her own, but I want her to know enough about wildness that she’ll follow me anyway.
Tit for tat, I think.
And to be honest, I think both those things are happening in my relationship with Maija. I’m definitely more affectionate with others than I would be without being with Maija. It’s counteracted a little bit by the pain and frustration of my parents separating, but still. I’m much more huggy with mum, and take more notice of my brothers, because of the caring nurturing spirit that rubs off from Maija. I can’t really speak for Maija, but I can see many things about her that have changed for the better, since we have been together. Things that she has taken pretty seriously, like University. I asked her to wait till September being starting her last year of Uni (for various reasons), and after initial refusal, she changed her schedule. That kind of thing blew me away, that she was already following my advice, and letting me lead, when she really doesn’t have a big obligation to do so.
That’s all for now. More to come later.
The plot thickens
0Following on from my previous post. Andrew Gazaneo had this to say:
“…I just think that there’s a deficit in men where we are uncomfortable sharing and receiving love, especially from the same sex. Maybe we’re afraid to show weakness. Not sure.”
I agree with Andrew, but I don’t think that’s the answer to the “problem.” I do think there’s a deficit in men. It’s something John Eldredge talks about in Waking the Dead, how men have developed a tendency to do things on their own and be these lone soldiers in the night. He says that the best way we can accomplish things is through support and teamwork with fellow guys, who can help each other long. He used Band of Brothers, and things like at as examples. So I definitely think that we men need to work better at expressing our love for one another, because it’s healthy and will only make us stronger and more effective people.
However, I think that is largely a side note. I still believe that today’s young women are showing their love for each other in a way that is either a bit inappropriate, or is mis-directed. Here’s an example:
A friend I was talking to recently said that on occasions he will be holding hands with his girlfriend, and she will say something about not wanting to holds anymore, for the moment. Sort of, “not in the mood.” Within a few minutes however, he saw said girlfriend sitting in the lap of another girl who had her arms wrapped about her. Can you see the inconsistency?
Naturally however, there are some excuses that can be made. If the girl is having her period, I can understand her wanting comfort from a girl, who better understands the pain. But that only excuses sections of every month, not life in general.
Let me throw this thought out: Maybe it’s just easier for a girl to take her comfort from another girl, than to take it from her boyfriend, her husband, her father, or God. Maybe it’s just the quickest most practical way.
If that’s the case, then I believe it’s also the wrong way. I read in a book that if you’re upset with your wife, it can be easier to masturbate than to make yourself vulnerable and have sex with her. But that’s wrong. Thus, along similar lines, guys and girls should always be taking comfort from God before anyone else, even if it’s easier to take that comfort from a good friend.
I understand very clearly that hard that is. But the hardest things are most often the best things. I need dinner now. Give me more feedback.
The problem with girls
0An interesting discussion arose between Maija and I, and my mother, last night. By the by, yesterday was our 6 month anniversary of being a couple. 6 months I have very much enjoyed, and plan on doing again, at least… 120 more times.
Anyway… here’s the rub. I think girls are too affectionate with one another. I was reading through a bunch of text messages on Maija’s phone (I was welcome to do so) and came across some from a girl in her cell. The content kindof creeped me out though…
“Hey hunny, just wanted to tell you I luv u. Have an awesome day. *name*”
“Hey hun, hope your day is going well, I’m just going to pick up *name*, luv you, *name*”
“Hey hun, I heard things weren’t going so well. Let God be your joy, and i luv you, big hugs, *name*”
“Hi hunny, how are things going? Thinking of you lots, luv and hugs *name*”
I read this out to my mother, who did think it was a little odd, but said this generation is much more “lovey-dovey” than hers. To be quite frank, if you read those above messages, there is nothing to tell you that they did not come from me. Or from a lesbian lover.
Now I am in no way insinuating that my girlfriend or her cell member are lesbians, I’m just saying this female affectionate easy-lesbianism has become incredibly rampant. Now, I don’t mean lesbian in the form of lesbian lovers, but more in the form of, “We don’t need men, we have other women.” Which I suspect stemmed from the feminist movement: “I don’t need a man to tell me I’m beautiful, my girls can tell me I’m beautiful. I don’t need a man to make me feel worth, my girls and I can just encourage each other, and everything will be fine.”
An interesting example happened a few weeks back, when I was with Maija and Bethany at their house, and Maija said, “Oh, honey…” and was talking to Bethany. I had to sharply bite back my tongue from saying, “I thought I was honey,” because I was genuinely hurt. Last night after I told her that, we tried to come up with some affectionate names that she could call her girl friends, that she doesn’t call me. Problem was, we had a tough time coming up with anything, cause she calls me and them by the same things. Which was a bit disconcerting.
Disclaimer: I’m not bashing Maija in any way. She knows I’m writing this. I’ve seen it rampant with girls all through high school, and unfortunately it’s no different with girls in the church.
If guys were to talk to each other in that manner, you would think they were homosexual. Why then are girls allowed to address each other in the same way? I don’t think it’s fair to just say, “Well, that’s the way girls are.” Guys struggle with lust, sexual sins, violence, etc., and a lot of people in the world simply say, “Boys will be boys,” but that doesn’t make any of those things permissible. It’s been seeming to me lately that guys are being called to a higher standard of holiness than girls are being called to. If that’s going to be the case, then I can deal with it, but at this stage I’m just a bit confused.
Maybe I’m completely out of whack here, but it’s honestly something I’ve been thinking about for a few months. Give me your feedback, I want to know if I’m completely alone in this, or if there are other guys who agree, and what you girls think.
Recent Comments